Mason Archival Repository Service

Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training

Show simple item record Sattler, David N. McKnight, Patrick E. Naney, Linda Mathis, Randy 2016-08-09T00:45:41Z 2016-08-09T00:45:41Z 2015-06-15
dc.identifier.citation Sattler DN, McKnight PE, Naney L, Mathis R (2015) Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130450. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130450 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study developed and evaluated a brief training program for grant reviewers that aimed to increase inter-rater reliability, rating scale knowledge, and effort to read the grant review criteria. Enhancing reviewer training may improve the reliability and accuracy of research grant proposal scoring and funding recommendations. Seventy-five Public Health professors from U.S. research universities watched the training video we produced and assigned scores to the National Institutes of Health scoring criteria proposal summary descriptions. For both novice and experienced reviewers, the training video increased scoring accuracy (the percentage of scores that reflect the true rating scale values), inter-rater reliability, and the amount of time reading the review criteria compared to the no video condition. The increase in reliability for experienced reviewers is notable because it is commonly assumed that reviewers—especially those with experience—have good understanding of the grant review rating scale. The findings suggest that both experienced and novice reviewers who had not received the type of training developed in this study may not have appropriate understanding of the definitions and meaning for each value of the rating scale and that experienced reviewers may overestimate their knowledge of the rating scale. The results underscore the benefits of and need for specialized peer reviewer training.
dc.description.sponsorship This document was prepared under contract number DE-AC05-06OR23100 between the U.S. Department of Energy and ORAU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Publication of this article was funded in part by the George Mason University Libraries Open Access Publishing Fund. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.subject Research validity en_US
dc.subject Research grants en_US
dc.subject Peer review en_US
dc.subject Public and occupational health en_US
dc.subject Demography en_US
dc.subject Questionnaires en_US
dc.subject Sense of agency en_US
dc.subject Cognition en_US
dc.title Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


My Account