Mason Archival Repository Service

What Role Has Identity Played in the Fyrom-Greece Naming Dispute?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Rubenstein, Richard
dc.contributor.author Miceli-Farrugia, Mark
dc.creator Miceli-Farrugia, Mark
dc.date 2013-09-13
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-03T17:26:54Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-03T17:26:54Z
dc.identifier doi:10.13021/G8SD5S
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/10742
dc.description.abstract The role of identity in the naming dispute between FYROM and Greece is critical. The three main parties – the ethnic Macedonians and the ethnic Albanians in FYROM and the Greeks - each have their own identity needs: 1.1 the Christian Orthodox, ethnic (Slavophone) Macedonians wish to be finally recognized as a sovereign people after having been dominated by fellow-Slavs and Ottoman Turks for over 1,400 years; 1.2 the Muslim, ethnic Albanian Macedonians wish to be granted the political and economic rights of a minority group within Macedonia after 600 years of subjugation, first under the Muslim Turkish Ottoman Empire, later under the Orthodox Christian, Slavophone Macedonian majority; and 1.3 the Christian Orthodox Greeks wish to be recognized as the sole propagators of Hellenism, created and diffused worldwide by Kings Philip II and Alexander the Great of Macedon 2,400 years ago. The Muslim ethnic Albanian Macedonians are involved only indirectly in the naming dispute: firstly, because their support is essential to FYROM’s ruling, nationalist VRMO-DPMNE government; and secondly, because they are especially keen on securing protective rights as a minority community via FYROM’s accession to NATO and the EU. As we shall see, identity as “part of an individual’s self-concept,” generates emotional defensive or even offensive responses, when frustrated. The interplay of such emotions with the economic uncertainty prevailing in both countries can create incendiary circumstances. Under such circumstances, politicians might resort to scapegoating - unfairly blaming external third-parties or – often - discernible, internal minority groups.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject social identity en_US
dc.subject intergroup conflict en_US
dc.subject ethnicity en_US
dc.subject nationalism en_US
dc.subject populism en_US
dc.subject sovereignty en_US
dc.title What Role Has Identity Played in the Fyrom-Greece Naming Dispute? en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Conflict Analysis and Resolution and Master of Arts in Conflict Resolution and Mediterranean Security en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Conflict Analysis and Resolution en_US
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en_US
thesis.degree.grantor University of Malta en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics