Mason Archival Repository Service

The Relationship between Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions, Traffic Volume, and Habitat Suitability-Based Wildlife Crossing Areas in Vermont, USA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Delamater, Paul L
dc.contributor.author Blackwell, Kate A
dc.creator Blackwell, Kate A
dc.date 2017-05-18
dc.date.accessioned 2017-12-21T20:21:44Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-18T07:00:16Z
dc.identifier doi:10.13021/G8QM4V
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/10864
dc.description This thesis has been embargoed for 5 years. It will not be available until May 2022 at the earliest. en_US
dc.description.abstract Of the many negative effects roads can have on wildlife, wildlife-vehicle collisions are the most devastating. Efforts to predict where wildlife cross roads are vital for mitigation and prevention efforts. In this study, a Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based approach was used to evaluate the relationship between wildlife-vehicle collisions, road traffic volume, and wildlife habitat suitability near roads. Road characteristics that potentially affect driver visibility and travel speeds, including the slope and curviness of the roads, were also considered. The robustness of the results was evaluated by varying the maximum length of the road segments in the spatial data and the distance from the roads used to estimate a wildlife crossing index based on habitat suitability. The case study evaluated moose (Alces alces) and black bear (Ursus americanus) collisions in VT from 1990 to 2006 for all roads in the state, three major roadways, and four functional classes of roadways. Habitat suitability had the most consistent results across models, as road segments with better suitability had a higher collision density. The robustness analysis showed that as the buffer distance used to estimate the wildlife crossing index increased, the explained variation of wildlife-vehicle collision density increased as well. Road traffic volume demonstrated mixed results across models, as higher volume was associated with more collisions in the models with all roads, but was associated with fewer collisions in the roadway-specific and functional classification models. The length of the road segments in the spatial data layer affected the predictive power of the models, suggesting that scale may be an important factor in characterizing these relationships. The results offer an improved understanding of wildlife-vehicle collisions, which can potentially be used to develop mitigation and prevention efforts aimed at reducing the negative effects of roads on wildlife.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject road ecology en_US
dc.subject wildlife crossings en_US
dc.subject traffic volume en_US
dc.subject wildlife-vehicle collisions en_US
dc.subject habitat suitability en_US
dc.subject roadkill en_US
dc.title The Relationship between Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions, Traffic Volume, and Habitat Suitability-Based Wildlife Crossing Areas in Vermont, USA en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Geographic and Cartographic Sciences en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Geographic and Cartographic Sciences en_US
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics