Mason Archival Repository Service

Sustainable Stormwater Management Using a Floating Wetland—a System Approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Ahn, Changwoo
dc.contributor.author McAndrew, Brendan
dc.creator McAndrew, Brendan
dc.date 2017-05-04
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-25T15:28:13Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-25T15:28:13Z
dc.identifier doi:10.13021/G85X1V
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/10971
dc.description.abstract Nitrogen is widely recognized as a chronic urban stormwater pollutant. In the United States, wet retention ponds have become widely used to treat urban runoff for quantity and quality. While wet ponds typically function well for the removal of sediments, nitrogen removal performance can be inconsistent due to poor design and/or lack of maintenance. Renovating ponds to improve their nitrogen capture performance, however, is typically expensive. A relatively untested technology called floating wetlands (FWs) has been proposed as a sustainable means of improving the nitrogen capture performance of stormwater wet ponds. The FWs are comprised of an artificial floating island that supports the hydroponic growth of plants on a pond, lake, or canal. As the plants grow on the floating island, their roots remove nitrogen directly from the water column and may trap waterborne sediments. Few studies have been performed on the effectiveness realworld stormwater systems, however. In this study, the nitrogen and sediment capture performance of a 50 m2 floating wetland deployed for 137 days on Mason Pond was investigated. A total of 2684 g of biomass was produced, 3100 g of sediment captured, and 191 g of nitrogen removed from the pond. Although biomass production was relatively low (53 g/m2), nitrogen uptake rate by the plants (0.009 g/m2/day) was comparable to contemporary FW studies. A system model was then developed from the collected data to simulate nitrogen removal performance of the FW on Mason Pond. The model was then used to test the nitrogen removal efficiency of the FW over longer deployment periods and with greater surface area coverage. While the literature suggests that FWs must cover at least 10-15% of the pond to significantly aid nitrogen removal, the model suggests only modest nitrogen removal efficiency (~6%) by an FW covering 25% of the surface of Mason Pond. These results may inform municipalities or developers that are considering the use of FWs on stormwater ponds.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject stormwater en_US
dc.subject BMP en_US
dc.subject floating wetland en_US
dc.subject nitrogen en_US
dc.subject sustainability en_US
dc.title Sustainable Stormwater Management Using a Floating Wetland—a System Approach en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Environmental Science and Policy en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Environmental Science and Policy en_US
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics