Mason Archival Repository Service

Reentry, Resistance, and Hybridization in the Long Shadow of the Devolving Penal State: An Ethnographic Study of a Community-Based Reentry Organization

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Rudes, Danielle S
dc.contributor.author Mackey, Benjamin J
dc.creator Mackey, Benjamin J
dc.date 2021-04-22
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-04T22:09:36Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-04T22:09:36Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1920/12096
dc.description.abstract As mass incarceration and supervision decline slowly and sporadically in the U.S. (Kang-Brown et al., 2018; Maruschak & Minton, 2020), scholars note that subtler forms of “invisible punishment” continue to affect individuals with a history of legal system involvement (Travis, 2002). This form of penality excludes individuals with criminal records from full societal participation and includes them in systems of penal rehabilitation and supervision (Cohen, 1985; Miller & Stuart, 2017). Increasingly, however, the state recedes from direct involvement in rehabilitation and supervision, instead devolving responsibility for these functions to non-governmental organizations in the community (Miller, 2014). In so doing, the state may be able to govern at a distance by influencing the operations of these organizations (Garland, 2001; Rose & Miller, 1992). The present study examines how staffers at a community-based reentry organization serving formerly incarcerated clients are both subject and resistant to state influence. Leveraged via grant contracts, state influence directs staffers to provide services focused on altering clients’ internal dispositions and prohibits them from engaging in advocacy activities intended to affect governmental operations. However, because they locate the problems afflicting their clients largely in exclusionary penal structures—rather than solely in their clients’ internal dispositions—staffers’ selectively resist state influence. Through this agonistic process of resistance (Goodman et al., 2017), rehabilitative penality as practiced at the organization hybridizes, commingling the organizational goals and routines of penal state authorities with those of advocacy-oriented reentry staffers. The final, hybridized form of this rehabilitative penality requires the client to not only effect dispositional changes, but to be an active agent advocating against the exclusionary penal structures afflicting them. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject reentry en_US
dc.subject penality en_US
dc.subject governing at a distance en_US
dc.subject sociology of punishment en_US
dc.subject carceral devolution en_US
dc.title Reentry, Resistance, and Hybridization in the Long Shadow of the Devolving Penal State: An Ethnographic Study of a Community-Based Reentry Organization en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
thesis.degree.name Master of Arts in Criminology, Law & Society en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en_US
thesis.degree.discipline Criminology, Law & Society en_US
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics