Abstract:
The religion and science conflict over human embryonic stem cell (hESC)
research carries high stakes; should embryos be protected as potential human life or
should they be studied as possible cures for debilitating diseases? With the current
technology, we cannot simultaneously satisfy both of these objectives—it is necessary to
destroy embryos to create totipotent stem cells. Both religion and science provide
significant inputs to the bioethical aspects of hESC research methods and practices. The
data includes structured interviews with clergy, educators, lobbyists, and scientists. To
objectively analyze and organize the data, the author developed pre-positioned
assessment criteria and the Shared Vision Model. The results include recommendations
for fully integrated solutions. As participants recognize their shared visions, problem
solving sessions in academic and religious settings could produce widely-accepted
solutions, leading to greater respect for both emerging and aging human life.
