Mason Archival Repository Service

Estimation of Soil Moisture in the Southern United States in 2003 Using Multi-Satellite Remote Sensing Measurements

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Soriano, Melissa
dc.creator Soriano, Melissa
dc.date 2008-11-24
dc.date.accessioned 2008-12-22T14:50:14Z
dc.date.available NO_RESTRICTION en
dc.date.available 2008-12-22T14:50:14Z
dc.date.issued 2008-12-22T14:50:14Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1920/3361
dc.description.abstract Soil moisture is a critical parameter for predicting and detecting floods and droughts, as well as indicating crop and vegetation health. Current indicators utilize surrogate or modeled measures of soil moisture. Actual observed soil moisture measurements have the potential to improve understanding of floods, droughts, and crop health. In this study, ground soil moisture daily average values were compared to estimates obtained from two microwave sensors, the EOS Aqua Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) and the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission Microwave Scanning Radiometer (TMI), as well as one optical sensor, the EOS Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The study areas were the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed in Oklahoma and the Little River Experimental Watershed in Georgia. This research compared AMSR-E, TMI, and MODIS data to ground data from the Little Washita Berg station and also compared AMSR-E and TMI data to ground data from the Little River Soil Climate Analysis Network station. AMSR-E and TMI performed better in Little Washita than in Little River during the crop-covered season. This may be due to the vegetation type, distribution, and density at Little River. AMSR-E exhibited a smaller range of variability than the TMI or in-situ measurements at both study sites for all time periods. In the crop-covered season of June, July, and August of 2003, MODIS soil moisture retrieval at the Little Washita site correlated better (R^2 = 0.772) with the in-situ measurements than AMSR-E or TMI soil moisture retrievals. The spatial resolution of MODIS (1 km) is finer than the spatial resolution of AMSR-E (~25 km) or TMI. Spatial resolution is an important factor because topography, soil properties, and vegetation cover may vary significantly over satellite footprints. Both microwave sensors are limited by their coarse spatial resolution. However, optical measurements are limited to cloud-free conditions. Future work includes research on algorithms which combine optical and microwave measurements to provide the advantages of each. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.subject soil moisture en
dc.subject AMSR-E en
dc.subject MODIS en
dc.subject remote sensing en
dc.subject TMI en
dc.subject Little Washita en
dc.title Estimation of Soil Moisture in the Southern United States in 2003 Using Multi-Satellite Remote Sensing Measurements en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Earth System Science en
thesis.degree.level Master's en
thesis.degree.discipline Earth Systems Science en
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics