Mason Archival Repository Service

Navy Sonar, Cetaceans, and the Supreme Court: Fairfax County Public Attitudes and Potential Ramifications

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Balint, Peter J.
dc.contributor.author Zirbel, Kylie E.
dc.creator Zirbel, Kylie E.
dc.date 2010-04-22
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-15T17:44:59Z
dc.date.available NO_RESTRICTION en_US
dc.date.available 2010-06-15T17:44:59Z
dc.date.issued 2010-06-15T17:44:59Z
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/5895
dc.description.abstract Ocean noise is particularly problematic for marine wildlife in the Northern hemisphere. One source of anthropogenic noise currently impacting cetaceans in particular is military sonar. As a result, environmental NGOs have pursued a series of legal battles to test how much leeway the Navy has concerning exemption from environmental laws. The legal battle made its way to the Supreme Court in the case Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Ruling of the court suggests that the military is held to different standards when it comes to the implementation of federal environmental law. Public opinion on the impact of navy sonar on cetaceans and current policy has not been sought previously and since public opinion is a key force in the development and implementation of policy it could be a valuable asset to stakeholders to understand. In this thesis, I used chi-square tests to determine which demographic variables were correlated with how respondents felt about Navy exemption. I found that age, level of education, and ocean activity participation did not have a significant relationship with how respondents felt about Navy exemption. I did find, however, that individuals who were conservative, Republican, and have served in the military were more likely to believe the Navy should be exempt from marine mammal protection regulations. I was unable to test my hypotheses regarding race/ethnicity and environmental group membership due to insufficient data. My study was also designed to investigate the respondents’ understanding of sonar and its impact on marine mammals in order to support a more comprehensive study in the future. The results that I obtained were that a majority of my sample believe that Navy sonar impacts marine mammals. A majority of my sample also believe that moderating sonar use would be an appropriate action to take if Navy sonar does impact marine mammals. I also found that a large majority of my sample has never heard about the case Winter v. NRDC. I conducted expert interviews to determine the potential ramifications of the Supreme Court case. A few noteworthy points found in the expert interviews include that the case exerts federal power over state power; its legal precedent sets limitations to the use of preliminary junctions under NEPA; and that it is possible to reconcile national security efforts with environmental protection.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject navy sonar en_US
dc.subject environmental policy en_US
dc.subject cetaceans en_US
dc.subject National Environmental Protection Act en_US
dc.subject Supreme Court en_US
dc.subject public attitudes en_US
dc.title Navy Sonar, Cetaceans, and the Supreme Court: Fairfax County Public Attitudes and Potential Ramifications en_US
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.name Master of Science Environmental Science & Public Policy en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en
thesis.degree.discipline Environmental Science and Public Policy en
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics