dc.description.abstract |
Skilled emigration has become an important policy concern of developing countries
for several decades. This dissertation closely examines the major effects of a scientific
brain drain on the source country against the background of global talent competition.
The sample used in this study is drawn from Chinese scientists in four disciplines of
natural sciences at leading global universities. By combining biographical and
bibliometric data, the dissertation not only demonstrates migration patterns of Chinese
scientists, but also reveals their research productivity profiles between 1998 and 2006.
The findings of this dissertation show that the scientific community in China
experienced increasing personnel exchange with the English academia during the
observation period. Emigrant scientists from China were selected positively, while
returnee scientists were selected negatively. Both patterns seemed to turn stronger over
time. However, the research gap between domestic scientists and overseas scientists had
been reduced substantially in terms of average productivity or highest performance.
Returnees with domestic degrees, instead of those with foreign degrees, largely drove the
rising productivity level in China. In addition, domestic scientists benefited greatly from
international collaboration in general, and collaboration with overseas Chinese in
particular.
This study also estimated the potential loss brought by the emigration of Chinese
scientists. Simulation outcomes based on the empirical findings demonstrate that the
intellectual loss to China looks striking under an ideal condition, but it would be reduced
substantially in more realistic scenarios with limited budget and less international
collaboration. The following counterfactual analysis shows that Chinese scientists would
have made a greater contribution to the world, if more of them could move abroad.
However, China’s research output would be lower than the actual level, because
additional returnees and international collaboration would not enough to compensate the
output of its lost manpower.
According to the major findings of this dissertation, restrictive measures of
international migration are counterproductive in improving global welfare. Specific
policies are recommended to both China and the host countries, so that they can share the
gain from emigration in a triple-win situation. This dissertation enriches our
understanding of international migration in the scientific community, and helps explain
China’s experience in achieving rapid scientific development. Its theoretical framework
and methodology may help policymakers in other countries evaluate outflows of their
skilled nationals and address related issues effectively. |
|