Mason Archival Repository Service

Family Communication Patterns, Resilience and Social Support among Hospice Family Caregivers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Villagran, Melinda M. Baldwin, Paula K.
dc.creator Baldwin, Paula K. 2012-04-30 2012-10-08T14:20:07Z NO_RESTRICTION en_US 2012-10-08T14:20:07Z 2012-10-08
dc.description.abstract Improvements in modern medicine have changed the trajectory of terminal illnesses. That, along with an already burdened health care system, has resulted in an exponential growth in the number of family caregivers now providing care for their dying loved ones. Family communication is a significant factor in all hospice interactions. Research has shown that families have specific communication patterns that remain consistent through the trajectory of a terminal disease (Syren, Saveman, & Benzein, 2006). Family communication patterns may affect the types of social support available to the family members and the potential for resilience among family caregivers following the death of their loved one. This study used in-depth, qualitative interviews with 15 hospice family caregivers to describe their family communication pattern styles, informal social support, perceptions of their personal resilience and usage of formal social support as provided through hospice services. Data analysis based on a typology of family communication patterns (Wittenberg-Lyles, Goldsmith, Demiris, Parker Oliver, & Stone, 2012, in press) revealed evidence of three distinct patterns of family communication among caregivers in this study. The Partner type, when family communication was open and frequent, was the most prevalent communication pattern described by caregivers. The Manager type, where the family communication was open, but dominated by a single person, was the second most common communication pattern. Only one family caregiver self-identified as the Loner family communication type, where the caregiver has little to no communication with the family and was unsupported in the caregiver burden by other family members. None of the family caregivers identified as Carrier family communication type, which was a low support, low communication family communication pattern. Only two caregivers used the hospice’s bereavement counseling, although several caregivers utilized other hospice support services such as volunteer visitation. When asked about their resilience, caregivers rated themselves anywhere from a moderate resilience to a medium high resilience. Caregivers’ resilience perceptions proved to be consistent with their narratives about their caregiving experience.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject caregivers en_US
dc.subject family communication patterns en_US
dc.subject resilience en_US
dc.subject social support en_US
dc.subject hospice en_US
dc.subject end of life en_US
dc.title Family Communication Patterns, Resilience and Social Support among Hospice Family Caregivers en_US
dc.type Dissertation en PhD in Communication en_US Doctoral en Communication en George Mason University en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


My Account