Mason Archival Repository Service

The Response of the Root and Soil Fungal Communities to Competition among Amphicarpaea bracteata, Onoclea sensibilis, and the Invasive Microstegium vimineum in Northern Virginia.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Torzilli, Albert P.
dc.contributor.author North, Brittany A.
dc.creator North, Brittany A.
dc.date 2013-07-24
dc.date.accessioned 2014-03-09T14:02:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-11T20:00:52Z
dc.date.issued 2014-03-09
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/8649
dc.description.abstract Of the many exotic plants occurring in the United States, the Asian grass Microstegium vimineum is highly invasive. A number of environmental variables seem to play a part in Microstegium’s invasiveness. However, the exact mechanisms that allow M. vimineum to outcompete native plants are not altogether known. This research used Brightfield microscopy and Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) to investigate the role of endophytic fungi including mycorrhizae in this grass’ invasive tendencies. Fungal communities of two native plants (Onoclea sensibilis and Amphicarpaea bracteata) were compared with the fungal communities found in Microstegium. All three plants occurred as monoculture communities and mixed communities in Northern Virginia. Brightfield microscopy identified Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AM) and Dark Septate Fungi (DSF) in all three plants. AM colonization rates were greater than 50% in all three plants in both monoculture and mixed plant communities. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCO) of ARISA fingerprint data identified fungal communities unique to each monoculture. When the three plants co-occurred in the mixed setting, Microstegium was found to maintain its unique fungal community while the two native plants were found to share their communities. A few small shifts between the communities in the grass and the fern suggest that the invasive grass might be integrating its fungal community into the native plant community. Unlike the root samples, multivariate analysis of soil fingerprints did not identify fungal communities unique to each plant. Instead, soils showed a random distribution. Overall, the sharing of fungal communities between roots of the two natives may represent the long-standing relationship between the two natives in contrast to the recently introduced exotic grass.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Japanese stillgrass (Microstegium vimineum) en_US
dc.subject fungal community structure en_US
dc.subject arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) en_US
dc.subject sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis) en_US
dc.subject hog peanut (Amphyicarpaea bracteata) en_US
dc.subject ARISA en_US
dc.title The Response of the Root and Soil Fungal Communities to Competition among Amphicarpaea bracteata, Onoclea sensibilis, and the Invasive Microstegium vimineum in Northern Virginia. en_US
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.name Master of Science in Environmental Science and Policy en_US
thesis.degree.level Master's en
thesis.degree.discipline Environmental Science and Policy en
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Browse

My Account

Statistics