Mason Archival Repository Service

Public Perception of the Effectiveness of Seven Counterterrorism Practices

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Johnson, Devon Hild, R Christopher C
dc.creator Hild, R Christopher C 2013-12-02 2014-06-02T14:31:47Z 2014-06-02T14:31:47Z 2014-06-02
dc.description.abstract This thesis focuses on public perception of the effectiveness of seven counterterrorism practices and policies. Using a survey of undergraduate and graduate students from 2005, this study examines two research questions: 1) Does the public believe specific counterterrorism strategies—installing video surveillance cameras in public places, conducting bag and package searches on planes, trains, subways and buses, monitoring internet communications, examining financial statements, monitoring telephone communications, reviewing library records and examining medical records—are effective, and 2) What factors influence perceptions of effectiveness? The results indicate that a vast majority of respondents believe that the practices are effective, with the exception of reviewing library records and examining medical records. Findings from multivariate analyses suggest that confidence in the government to prevent terrorism is a key predictor of perceived effectiveness across all seven practices.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject counterterrorism en_US
dc.subject September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001 en_US
dc.subject public opinion en_US
dc.subject effectiveness en_US
dc.subject Patriot Act en_US
dc.subject public perception en_US
dc.title Public Perception of the Effectiveness of Seven Counterterrorism Practices en_US
dc.type Thesis en Master of Arts in Criminology, Law, and Society en_US Master's en Criminology, Law and Society en George Mason University en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


My Account