Mason Archival Repository Service

Establishing a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Burundi: Perspectives on Possibilities and Challenges

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Lyons, Terrence Nimuraba, Sixte Vigny
dc.creator Nimuraba, Sixte Vigny 2014-08-21 2014-10-27T20:05:44Z 2014-10-27T20:05:44Z 2014-10-27
dc.description.abstract This is a qualitative study of the perspectives of the Burundian people, leaders and the international community on the role of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in promoting reconciliation in Burundi. Literature on transitional justice argues that TRCs promote reconciliation. According to Lederach, reconciliation is a place where truth and mercy, justice and peace meet. The objective is to explore how Burundian people think a truth and reconciliation commission can impact reconciliation in Burundi, after decades of interethnic conflict, 14 years after the Arusha Accord which suggested the creation of that TRC even if it has not yet taken place. The study also explores briefly the history of the Burundian interethnic conflict during the pre-colonial, the colonial and the post-colonial era. After independence, the country was not able to build unity, equal and fair distribution of resources among the three ethnic groups (Hutu, Tutsi and Twa). As an effort to reconcile Burundian people, discussions on the ways in which reconciliation can be promoted in Burundi have dominated academic, practitioner and civil society leaders on the role that a TRC can play in Burundi. A sample population of 20 people from Burundi, Canada and United States participated in this study through interviews during the period from September 2013 until January 2014. They expressed their concerns about the ability of the TRC to promote reconciliation in Burundi. They also argued that the concepts of reconciliation, truth and justice have a slight difference meaning for Burundian people and therefore assuming that justice for example can promote reconciliation in a context where justice is symbol of power setting apart the winner and the loser may be misleading. Finally this study suggest that reconciliation should be the outcome of a slow development of local initiatives such as the Bashingantahe practice which brings together two conflicting individuals or groups and oblige them to share a drink on the same gourd with the same straw, as a symbol of respect, love, forgiveness and reconciliation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.rights Copyright 2014 Sixte Vigny Nimuraba en_US
dc.subject Truth and Reconciliation Commission en_US
dc.subject Burundi en_US
dc.subject interethnic conflicts en_US
dc.subject transitional justice en_US
dc.subject reconciliation en_US
dc.subject dealing with the past en_US
dc.title Establishing a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Burundi: Perspectives on Possibilities and Challenges en_US
dc.type Thesis en Master of Science in Conflict Analysis and Resolution en_US Master's en Conflict Analysis and Resolution en George Mason University en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


My Account