Mason Archival Repository Service

An Evaluation of Metaphors in Climate Change Discourse

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Maibach, Edward
dc.contributor.author Walsh-Thomas, Jenell Marie
dc.creator Walsh-Thomas, Jenell Marie
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-29T01:16:38Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-29T01:16:38Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/10602
dc.description.abstract Anthropogenic climate change is currently one of the biggest threats facing the human population across the globe. Most Americans, however have little understanding of this threat, and as a result may be ill-prepared to make important personal and societal decisions necessary to deal with it. This dissertation explores the practicality, usefulness, and effectiveness of metaphors as a means of enhancing public understanding of climate change. Three sequential studies were conducted to develop, test, and refine a set of science, metaphorical, and ‘science + metaphorical’ explanations of four basic climate change concepts: the frequency of extreme weather events; the increasing rate of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; the enhanced greenhouse effect; and the difference between weather and climate. In the first study, in-depth interviews were conducted with experts (n = 12) to explore the adequacy of the ‘science + metaphorical’ explanations of the climate concepts, each expressed in approximately 520 to 650 word essay. Overall, the experts were intrigued by the metaphors and viewed them as a promising way to explain and connect to lay audiences. The expert feedback was used to revise each of the explanatory essays. In the second study, in-depth interviews were conducted with non-scientists (n = 30) to explore how helpful and clear the essays were to a lay audience. The non-expert participants identified the metaphors as helpful to their understanding of the topic climate change concept. While the non-experts appeared more confident in explaining climate change after reading the short essays, the metaphors were infrequently rearticulated in their improved and more detailed explanations. The essays were edited again to clarify points of confusion identified in these interviews. The third study was an experiment which members of the public (n = 1523) were randomly assigned to read about one climate change concept explained using one of three explanation types (science only, metaphor only, or ‘science + metaphor’). There was some evidence that the ‘science + metaphor’ explanations worked as hypothesized in improving participants’ understanding and increasing belief certainty that climate change is happening. However, the differences observed between explanation types for the four climate change concepts were mostly non-significant. In total, the results of this dissertation suggest that metaphors may be useful in explaining climate change concepts to lay audiences. Additional theoretical and practical implications for the three studies are also discussed.
dc.format.extent 253 pages
dc.language.iso en
dc.rights Copyright 2016 Jenell Marie Walsh-Thomas
dc.subject Environmental studies en_US
dc.subject analogy en_US
dc.subject attitude change en_US
dc.subject Climate change en_US
dc.subject information processing en_US
dc.subject metaphors en_US
dc.subject science communication en_US
dc.title An Evaluation of Metaphors in Climate Change Discourse
dc.type Dissertation
thesis.degree.level Ph.D.
thesis.degree.discipline Environmental Science and Policy
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics