Revisiting the Constitution: A Case For Parliamentary System in Central Asia?

Permanent citation URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1920/2449


Files in This Item:

Title: Revisiting the Constitution: A Case For Parliamentary System in Central Asia?
Author(s): Abdukadirov, Sherzod
Keywords: institutional design; presidential; parliamentary; Central Asia; elections; Sherzod Abdukadirov
Issue Date: 16-May-2007
Series/Report no.: GMU School of Public Policy Doctoral Working Paper Series
0607-003
Abstract: Institutional design can impact the dynamics of power relations in authoritarian regimes. Under the presidential system in Central Asian states, the elite factions agree upon a presidential candidate before the elections and then ensure their candidate’s victory by manipulating the elections. As the cost of exclusion in this process is very high, every elite faction is forced to collude with the other factions. Under a parliamentary system, bargaining among the elites in selection of the head of state would occur after the elections as the elites would have to first secure parliamentary seats to be able to vote for the head of state. Such a process would reduce the stakes in each particular election, making it harder for the elites to manipulate elections yet safer to allow some opposition. Furthermore, the balance of power among the elites in parliament would be decided by the people, giving them a voice in the process.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1920/2449
Appears in Collections:SPP Doctoral Working Papers

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in MARS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, to the extent allowed by law.

 

Contact the MARS Librarian.
DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2006 MIT and Hewlett-Packard