The Politics of “Entrepreneurial” State Economic Development Policy
|
Permanent citation URL:
|
Files in This Item:
| Title: | The Politics of “Entrepreneurial” State Economic Development Policy |
| Author(s): | Hart, David M. |
| Keywords: | economic development; state government; entrepreneurship; public policy; small business; business recruitment; David Hart; David M. Hart; SPP; School of Public Policy; George Mason University |
| Issue Date: | 20-Jun-2007 |
| Series/Report no.: | GMU School of Public Policy Faculty Working Papers 1 |
| Abstract: | “Entrepreneurial” state economic development strategies, which focus on nurturing home-grown high-technology and other high-growth businesses, lack immediate payoffs for politically powerful constituencies, a condition that would seem likely to limit their political appeal compared to the alternative “locational” strategy of attracting large investments from elsewhere. Nonetheless, many states have added programs with entrepreneurial attributes to their economic development portfolios in recent years. This paper explores how the political obstacles to such programs have been overcome, using a set of sixteen brief case studies. In a few cases, an institutional innovation in the policy-making process drew in new participants who provided ideas for and support to programs with entrepreneurial elements. More commonly, the preferences of the executive branch officials, especially governors, appear to have been critical to the enactment and implementation of such programs. The finding suggests that ED policy-making may be more technocratic than is commonly believed, and that the educational efforts of policy experts, who generally favor entrepreneurial ED strategies over locational ED strategies, have been fruitful and should be sustained. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1920/2522 |
| Appears in Collections: | SPP Faculty Working Papers |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in MARS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, to the extent allowed by law.