Mason Archival Repository Service

Discursive Construction of Post-9/11 American National Identity: United by “the Enemy”

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Rogers, Paul M. Parker, Robin A.
dc.creator Parker, Robin A. 2014-05-02 2014-10-14T20:48:37Z 2014-10-14T20:48:37Z 2014-10-14
dc.description.abstract National identity derives from a sense of sameness and cohesion; however, scholars across fields accept the nation as an “imagined community” and that national identity changes. In this thesis, I conduct a Critical Discourse Analysis of political speeches and informal interviews to investigate the post-9/11 discursive construction of American national identity. With a theoretical backing in social constructionism and Norman Fairclough’s articulation of CDA, I focused on lexico-grammatical features and intertextuality and interdiscursivity. Taking head from Ruth Wodak’s study of Austrian national identity, I also analyzed my corpus for constructive strategies of assimilation. Although many discourses contribute to the construction of national identity, the post-9/11 discourse overtly addresses what it means to be American and constructs a stark “other” in the form of terrorism. This study finds that while citizens criticize politics, their sense of “sameness” becomes most concrete when faced with a threat or opposition in the form of terrorism, or when discussing Muslims not associated with terrorism.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Copyright 2014 Robin A. Parker en_US
dc.subject national identity en_US
dc.subject critical discourse analysis en_US
dc.subject post-9/11 rhetoric en_US
dc.subject social constructionism en_US
dc.subject American national identity en_US
dc.title Discursive Construction of Post-9/11 American National Identity: United by “the Enemy” en_US
dc.type Thesis en Master of Arts in English en_US Master's en English en George Mason University en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


My Account