Why IUCN Should Replace “Data Deficient” Conservation Status with a Precautionary “Assume Threatened” Status—A Cetacean Case Study
dc.contributor.author | Parsons, E. Christien Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-03T18:18:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-03T18:18:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-10-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Parsons, E. C. M. “Why IUCN Should Replace ‘Data Deficient’ Conservation Status with a Precautionary ‘Assume Threatened’ Status—A Cetacean Case Study.” Frontiers in Marine Science 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00193. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmars.2016.00193 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1920/11071 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Frontiers | |
dc.rights | Attribution 3.0 United States | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ | |
dc.subject | Data deficient | |
dc.subject | Assume threatened | |
dc.subject | IUCN Red list | |
dc.subject | Precautionary principle | |
dc.subject | Beaked whales | |
dc.title | Why IUCN Should Replace “Data Deficient” Conservation Status with a Precautionary “Assume Threatened” Status—A Cetacean Case Study | |
dc.type | Article |