Paper: "Seven Ways to Portray Complexity," February 28, 1996
dc.contributor.author | Warfield, John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-07-11T20:19:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-11T20:19:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996-02-28 | |
dc.description | Manuscript: typescript with figures, 39 pgs. 8.5" x 11" (21.6 cm x 29.7 cm) | en |
dc.description.abstract | A paper presented as part of a presentation at the George Washington University Notational Engineering Laboratory. Explains why prose is inherently inadequate when dealing with complexity and provides seven graphical methods that Warfield found useful in representing complexity. They are Arrow-Bullet Diagrams, Element Relation Diagrams, Fields, Profiles, Total Inclusion Structures, Partition Structures, and DELTA charts. John N. Warfield Collection 11.30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1920/3168 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.13021/MARS/13146 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | Warfield, John N. | |
dc.subject | Complexity | |
dc.subject | George Washington University Notational Engineering Laboratory | |
dc.subject | DELTA charts | |
dc.subject | Arrow-Bullet Diagrams | |
dc.subject | Element Relation Diagrams | |
dc.subject | Profiles | |
dc.subject | Total Inclusion Structures | |
dc.subject | Partition Structures | |
dc.title | Paper: "Seven Ways to Portray Complexity," February 28, 1996 | |
dc.type | Presentation |