Bridging the Research/Practice Gap: Street-level Decision Making and Historical Influences Related to Use of Evidence-based Practices in Adult Probation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorRudes, Danielle S.
dc.contributor.authorViglione, Jill Elizabeth
dc.creatorViglione, Jill Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-29T18:40:40Z
dc.date.available2015-07-29T18:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractGrowing empirical research finds that a correctional system devoted to punishment is ineffective and can actually produce criminogenic effects (Nagin, Cullen & Johnson, 2009). As a result, many justice organizations, including probation, are encouraging managers and staff to adopt evidence-based practices (EBPs)--practices supported by scientific evidence, such as validated risk and needs assessments, motivational interviewing, and cognitive-behavioral therapies. Current research finds that when used appropriately, evidenced-based, rehabilitative interventions are effective at reducing recidivism (Andrews & Bonta, 2010) and improving overall probation success (Taxman, 2008). Despite this push, justice organizations are often slow to adopt and implement effective practices. Implementation of EBPs falls heavily on street-level workers, like probation officers (POs) as they adopt/adapt and implement policy and practice changes by incorporating them into routines and decisions. Using a mixed method approach (ethnography and surveys), this study builds upon traditional street-level decision-making literature, but broadens the scope of inquiry by critically examining how POs understand, define and adapt new practices to their existing organizational routines. Further, this dissertation examines the conditions under which POs make adaptations to policy and the role that organizational culture and the history of the organization plays in shaping adaptation decisions, which ultimately play a critical role in the way in which POs carry out their job and policies designed to improve probation practice and outcomes.
dc.format.extent328 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1920/9644
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 Jill Elizabeth Viglione
dc.subjectCriminology
dc.subjectEvidence-based practices
dc.subjectImplementation Science
dc.subjectOrganizations
dc.subjectProbation
dc.titleBridging the Research/Practice Gap: Street-level Decision Making and Historical Influences Related to Use of Evidence-based Practices in Adult Probation
dc.typeDissertation
thesis.degree.disciplineCriminology, Law and Society
thesis.degree.grantorGeorge Mason University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Viglione_gmu_0883E_10804.pdf
Size:
1.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

College of Humanities and Social Sciences