Translating Mediation Guidance into Practice: Commentary on the UN Guidance for Effective Mediation by the Mediation Support Network

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorAvasiloae, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorCristescu, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorDziatkowiec, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHellmueller, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKirchhoff, Lars
dc.contributor.authorKraus, Anne Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMason, Simon
dc.contributor.authorMutisi, Martha
dc.contributor.authorStock, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorUnger, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorYousuf, Zahbia
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T04:44:46Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T04:44:46Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThis is a short monograph that summarizes a series of meetings of the Mediation Support Network (MSN), a network of primarily non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that support mediation in peace negotiations. Specifically, MSN members discussed and reflected on the “UN Guidance for Effective Mediation” and specifically focused on how to translate the UN Guidance into practice. Rather than being a comprehensive commentary, this document therefore focuses on certain issues and cases that seem pertinent from the MSN perspective. The discussions focused on numerous case studies that illustrate the challenges of mediation, and how they were dealt with. The aim of these case studies – some of them specifically focusing on the NGO role in mediation – is to help translate the UN Guidance into effective practice. A few key themes about mediation were featured: preparedness; consent; impartiality; inclusivity; national ownership; international law and a normative framework; coherence, coordination, and complementarity; and quality peace agreements. Conclusions included the need for mediation to be professionalized and that careful analysis is needed before any mediation action. Such analysis and strategizing requires the long-term development of institutional and human capacity. There is a strong and legitimate call for making mediation processes more inclusive, with regard to the inclusion of a range of actors (e.g., marginalized groups, women, religious actors, etc.) and with regard to the content of a peace agreement. However, mediators often face pressure to reach a minimum agreement quickly, especially when hostilities are ongoing. This can make it particularly difficult to reach more inclusive, and thus more complex, agreements. Inclusivity also entails efforts, outside the formal mediation process, to support dialogue between actors, so that they can better influence formal processes and sustain peace agreements once they are signed. Coordination of mediators benefits from the inclusion of civil society: Local mediators are often forgotten, even if they have many comparative advantages and play a key role before, during and after formal peace processes.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1920/12757
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMediation Support Network
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Points of the Mediation Support Network;2
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.subjectMediation
dc.subjectInclusive Peace Process
dc.subjectPeace Agreement
dc.titleTranslating Mediation Guidance into Practice: Commentary on the UN Guidance for Effective Mediation by the Mediation Support Network
dc.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Translating_Mediation_Guidance_into_Prac (1).pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.52 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Better Evidence Resource Library