Quantitative Analysis of Regulatory Discourses on Agricultural Genetic Engineering: An Exploration and Empirical Application of Critical Theory

dc.contributor.advisorTalbot, Lee M.
dc.contributor.authorGreenblott, Joseph M.
dc.creatorGreenblott, Joseph M.
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-09T15:39:27Z
dc.date.available2013-08-09T15:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation takes a multidisciplinary approach to examining public policy. On one level, the dissertation is a case study of the use of methodological triangulation to understand the values and beliefs of people within a regulatory system associated with a complex social issue: modern biotechnology/genetic engineering. On another level it is a deep exploration and a practical application of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
dc.format.extent458 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1920/8255
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsCopyright 2013 Joseph M. Greenblott
dc.subjectEnvironmental philosophy
dc.subjectPolitical Science
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectAgricultural biotechnology
dc.subjectCritical theory
dc.subjectEnvironmental sociology
dc.subjectGenetically engineered organisms
dc.subjectGenetically modified organisms
dc.subjectQ methodology
dc.titleQuantitative Analysis of Regulatory Discourses on Agricultural Genetic Engineering: An Exploration and Empirical Application of Critical Theory
dc.typeDissertation
thesis.degree.disciplineEnvironmental Science and Public Policy
thesis.degree.grantorGeorge Mason University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Greenblott_gmu_0883E_10284.pdf
Size:
8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format