Mason Archival Repository Service

The Effectiveness of Participation in Public and Private Standard Setting

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Rudder, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.author Ranville, Michelle R.
dc.creator Ranville, Michelle R. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-29T18:06:06Z
dc.date.available 2014-09-29T18:06:06Z
dc.date.issued 2014-08 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1920/8983
dc.description.abstract Due process requirements established by the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 were designed to improve the ability of the regulated community to provide information to federal agencies and to hold agencies accountable for considering that information. Similar due process requirements, such as those set forth by the American National Standards Institute, direct the standards development activities of many non-government standards developers. Though written due process requirement are similar, there are important differences between the public and private systems which could affect whether relevant information is both delivered to policymakers and considered. Through a comparative case study of labor union participation in public and private occupational safety and health standards, this study examines the effects of these differences and the effectiveness of participation in each system based on the intent of the Administrative Procedure Act and democratic criteria. Recommendations for improving the effectiveness of participation in each system are made based on the research findings.
dc.format.extent 261 pages en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Copyright 2014 Michelle R. Ranville en_US
dc.subject Public policy en_US
dc.subject Political Science en_US
dc.subject Public administration en_US
dc.subject due process en_US
dc.subject labor unions en_US
dc.subject participation en_US
dc.subject private governance en_US
dc.subject safety and health standards en_US
dc.subject standard-setting en_US
dc.title The Effectiveness of Participation in Public and Private Standard Setting en_US
dc.type Dissertation en
thesis.degree.level Doctoral en
thesis.degree.discipline Public Policy en
thesis.degree.grantor George Mason University en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics