Mason Archival Repository Service

Special Education Teachers’ Perspectives of Alternate Assessments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Burton, Erin Peters Griffin, Jodi
dc.creator Griffin, Jodi 2016-10-27 2017-10-03T17:26:18Z 2017-10-03T17:26:18Z
dc.identifier doi:10.13021/G81X07
dc.description.abstract Attrition of special education teachers who are specially trained to teach students who are the most severely disabled is of great concern. This thesis examines special education teachers’ perceptions of alternate assessments, specifically with the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP). Issues surrounding difficulties special education teachers faced, the ongoing debate about which type of curriculum should be primary in classrooms, functional or academic skills curriculums, and data from previous studies were discussed. Teachers who left the field, “goers”, and those who have remained, “stayers”, were interviewed about their personal experiences with the VAAP based on common themes from past research. The two groups were bounded to be examined as a multiple case study and results indicated that there were both similarities and differences between the two cases. Uncovered from the interviews were positive attitudes, student focused strategies, and collaborative supports in place by those who remained in the field. Discussion, implications and recommendations are also presented.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject special education en_US
dc.subject teachers' perceptions en_US
dc.subject alternate assessments en_US
dc.subject VAAP en_US
dc.title Special Education Teachers’ Perspectives of Alternate Assessments en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US Master of Science in Educational Psychology en_US Master's en_US Educational Psychology en_US George Mason University en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MARS

Advanced Search


My Account